告诉HN:/active和showdead可能会带来更丰富的信息体验。

6作者: hahaxdxd1232 个月前原帖
如果你访问 https://news.ycombinator.com/active 而不是默认的 https://news.ycombinator.com 页面,结果会非常不同。根据我的经验,这里有更多有趣的内容。 以下是当前在 /active 的前十名提交列表,这些内容在默认首页上根本没有出现: “迄今为止最有希望的外星生命迹象” - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43714203 - 被标记 - 美国政府威胁哈佛大学禁止外国学生 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43715022 Jellyfin 作为 Spotify 的替代品 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43711706 这个“大学抗议者”并不真实。它是一个为警察服务的人工智能潜伏机器人 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43716939 加密并不是犯罪 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43716138 这些提交对我来说很有趣,并且在我看来都与科技/科学有关(是的,甚至包括哈佛的那个 - 外国学生人才减少会导致创新减少)。我理解隐藏这些内容的理由 - 大多数都是政治性或带有意见的,可能引发争议。但我相信自己对值得消费内容的最佳判断,个人不希望任何算法为我做决定(除了简单的函数 f(upvotes, time_elapsed))。
查看原文
If you go on https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;active instead of the default https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com page, the results are very different. In my experience, much more interesting content.<p>Here is a quick list of submissions that are currently on the top 10 of &#x2F;active that are not on the default front page at all.<p>“Most promising signs yet” of alien life on a planet beyond our Solar System - https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43714203<p>-flagged- US Government threatens Harvard with foreign student ban - https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43715022)<p>Jellyfin as a Spotify alternative - https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43711706<p>This &#x27;College Protester&#x27; Isn&#x27;t Real. It&#x27;s an AI-Powered Undercover Bot for Cops - https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43716939<p>Encryption Is Not a Crime - https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43716138<p>These submissions are interesting to me and IMO are all related to tech&#x2F;science (yes, even the Harvard one - fewer talented foreign students leads to less innovation). I understand the reasoning for hiding these - most are political or opinionated and lead to possibly inflammatory debate. But I trust my own best judgement for what is worth consuming and personally don&#x27;t want any algorithm deciding for me (other than a simple function of f(upvotes, time_elapsed)).