问HN：你的公司是如何适应使用大型语言模型（LLMs）进行招聘的？
现在大型语言模型（LLM）开始变得相当优秀，你们公司是如何适应这一新环境的？仅仅评估一个人是否擅长编程已经不再足够，我们需要筛选出一个人在工程方面的能力。根据我的经验，软件工程正在逐渐成熟，类似于其他工程领域。机械工程师不会自己加工零件（当然，他们至少应该亲自做几次，以理解加工的限制）。软件工程师需要评估代码是否“优秀”（机械工程师会测试他们的零件），然后围绕这些代码设计系统。就我所见，未来有两种前进的方式。
1. 只进行现场面试，并承担差旅费用。
2. 测试系统设计能力和文化适应性。
现场面试可以提供一个公平的竞争环境，面试者不需要为了“隐藏自己使用大型语言模型”的最佳人选而竞争。
大家对此有什么看法？
查看原文
Now that llm's are starting to get pretty good how has your company's adapted to the new environment. It's no longer good enough to see if someone's good a programing, instead we need to screen if someone is good at engineering. In my experience Software Engineering is starting to mature like other forms of engineering. Mechanical Engineers don't mill out their parts (Well they should at least a couple of times to understand the constraints of machining). SWE's need to see if the code is "good" (Mech E's test their parts) and then design the systems around them. As far as I can see there are two ways of going forwards.<p>1. Only do on sites and eat the travel expenses<p>2. Test for systems design and culture fit<p>On sites allow for a level playing field where interviewees don't need to compete for the [best person hiding their llm use](https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1j436it/a_student_used_ai_to_beat_amazons_brutal/).<p>What are people's thoughts?