我们需要一个抗审查的真相协议——我有这个想法，但没有相关技能。
以下是您提供内容的中文翻译：
这是我心中思考已久的一个问题。我不是开发者，不从事加密货币行业，也没有技术能力去构建这个。但我一直在关注全球范围内的审查和叙事控制的趋势——我再也无法忽视它了。
现在说政府——无论是专制的还是“民主”的——正在公开努力限制某些信息的传播，已经不再是阴谋论了。他们甚至不试图掩饰这一点。他们对平台进行监管，强迫删除内容，威胁罚款，并将“虚假信息”作为法律的撬棍。他们真正害怕的不是混乱，甚至不是谎言。他们害怕的是未经过滤的真相。
那种未经解释、品牌化、由“合作伙伴”进行事实核查或被算法埋没的真相。那种原始的、不舒服的、不可预测的真相——最重要的是——无法被控制的真相。
而这正是我认为我们需要保护的。我相信我们需要一个协议——而不是一家公司、一个平台或一个品牌——使真相在功能上几乎不可能被审查。不是因为审查它是非法的，而是因为在技术和社会上这样做是不可行的。
我们已经见识到了当权力感到威胁时会发生什么：平台被收买，创始人受到压力，政策发生变化。即使是承诺成为“言论自由”平台的推特，已经开始妥协。脸书与国家利益一致。YouTube可以因为错误的医学观点而删除视频。Substack和Rumble可能暂时坚持，但它们仍然是瓶颈，仍然是目标，仍然脆弱。
我们需要的是一种像活着的、呼吸的免疫系统一样的真相保护机制。一个以类似于种子网络分发文件的方式分发敏感或重要信息的协议——冗余、不可逆转和自主的。一个让人们能够举报腐败、滥用权力、虚伪和浪费的机制——并以一种没有任何单一实体可以抹去的方式上传、验证、分析和发布这些证据。
理想情况下，这应该包括匿名举报的机制。基于人工智能的模式检测，以连接不同案件之间的点。对政治家、法官、机构和机构的公共评分。对承诺的跟踪与兑现。基于行动而非营销的声誉。公共资金的可追溯性。默认的激进透明性。所有这些都应由去中心化的存储和共识支持。
我知道，这些想法中有些可能已经在某些方面存在。但它们并不统一，不够坚固，也不被信任。最重要的是，它们并不是从一开始就以一个目标为导向设计的：让真相不可阻挡。
这个想法——我称之为VERITAS——不是关于意识形态的。它不是左派或右派。它不关心政党。它只关心事实、证据和问责制。它应该与被拥有、被货币化、被收买或被关闭根本不兼容。
我知道这听起来很雄心勃勃。但我相信这是必要的。如今的国家并不是通过合法性生存，而是通过叙事控制生存。如果我们剥夺这种控制——不是通过暴力，不是通过混乱，而是通过冷静、坚实、数据驱动的透明度——我们可以从根本上改变权力的运作方式。
所以这是我的邀请。我不是在请求捐款。我也没有启动任何项目。我只是想看看是否有其他人感受到同样的紧迫感。谁理解这一技术方面，并可能想要勾勒出这样一个系统的样子。
请分叉这个想法。偷走它。在此基础上构建。改进它。让它比我想象的更好。或者联系我——我很乐意一起合作。我只希望它能存在。因为我们的时间不多了，墙壁正在逼近。一旦真相完全被许可——我们就失去了一切。
让我们现在就让它不可审查，趁还不算太晚。
查看原文
Here’s something that’s been on my mind for a while. I’m not a developer, I don’t work in crypto, I don’t have technical skills to build this. But I’ve been watching the trend of censorship and narrative control around the world — and I can’t unsee it anymore.<p>It’s no longer a conspiracy theory to say that governments — authoritarian or “democratic” — are now openly working to limit the distribution of certain kinds of information. They don’t even try to hide it. They regulate platforms, force takedowns, threaten fines, and use "disinformation" as a legal crowbar. What they really fear isn’t chaos, or even lies. What they fear is unfiltered truth.<p>Truth that hasn’t been interpreted, branded, fact-checked by “partners,” or algorithmically buried. Truth that’s raw, uncomfortable, unpredictable, and — most of all — uncontainable.<p>And that’s exactly what I think we need to protect. I believe we need a protocol — not a company, not a platform, not a brand — that makes truth functionally impossible to censor. Not because it’s illegal to censor it, but because it’s technically and socially unviable to do so.<p>We’ve seen what happens when power feels threatened: platforms are co-opted, founders are pressured, policies change. Even Twitter, which promised to be the “free speech” platform, is already bending. Facebook is state-aligned. YouTube can kill a video for having the wrong medical take. Substack and Rumble may hold out for now, but they’re still choke points. Still targetable. Still fragile.<p>What we need is something like a living, breathing immune system for truth. A protocol that distributes sensitive or critical information the same way a torrent network distributes files — redundantly, irreversibly, and autonomously. Something that allows people to report corruption, abuse of power, hypocrisy, waste — and have that evidence uploaded, validated, analyzed, and published in a way that no single entity can erase.<p>Ideally, this would include mechanisms for anonymous whistleblowing. AI-based pattern detection to connect dots across cases. Public scoring for politicians, judges, institutions, agencies. Tracking of promises made vs. delivered. Reputation based on action, not marketing. Public money traceability. Radical transparency by default. And everything backed by decentralized storage and consensus.<p>I know, some of this may already exist in parts. But it’s not unified. It’s not bulletproof. It’s not trusted. And most importantly, it’s not designed from the ground up with one goal in mind: to make truth unstoppable.<p>This idea — I call it VERITAS — isn’t about ideology. It’s not left or right. It doesn’t care about parties. It only cares about facts, evidence, and accountability. And it should be fundamentally incompatible with being owned, monetized, co-opted, or shut down.<p>I know this sounds ambitious. But I believe it’s necessary. The State, as it exists today, doesn’t survive through legitimacy — it survives through narrative control. And if we take that away — not with violence, not with chaos, but with cold, hard, data-driven transparency — we can fundamentally alter how power operates.<p>So this is my invitation. I’m not asking for donations. I’m not launching anything. I just want to see if there are people out there who feel the same urgency. Who understand the technical side of this, and who might want to sketch out what a system like this would look like.<p>Fork this idea. Steal it. Build on it. Improve it. Make it better than I imagined. Or reach out — I’d be glad to work together. I just want it to exist. Because we’re running out of time, and the walls are closing in. And once truth becomes fully permissioned — we’ve lost everything.<p>Let’s make it uncensorable now, before it’s too late.