请问HN:在非美国国家的一个奇怪的归属条款

1作者: ayjay_t6 天前原帖
我正在与一个外国的董事会进行争论,在那里,投资合同中通常规定,如果整个期限(4或5年)没有完成,员工将无法保留已归属的权益——这些权益会被公司以面值回购(我想是这样的)。<p>我只是想听听大家对这个条款的看法。对我来说,这似乎不太好,但这里的人们显然支持这一做法,我认为这可能是文化因素。或者我错了?这也是美国的情况吗?<p>大家有什么意见?
查看原文
I&#x27;m in argument with a board in a foreign nation, where it&#x27;s typical in vesting contracts that if the whole term isn&#x27;t complete (4 or 5 years), the employees don&#x27;t keep what&#x27;s vested- it&#x27;s bought back by the company (at the paper rate, I imagine).<p>I&#x27;m just fielding opinions about this term. Seems bad to me, but definitely people around here are in support of it, a cultural thing I think. Or maybe I&#x27;m wrong? Is it an American thing as well?<p>Opinions?