HackerNews中文版

嘿，HN，我已经在构建独立的SaaS产品一段时间了，有一件事一直困扰着我：为什么SaaS模板这么贵——而且仍然不完整？ 199美元的模板竟然连支付功能都没有？有些模板的身份验证设置得不够好。还有一些则充满了我最后不得不剔除的冗余功能。所以，我决定不再购买另一个 overpriced 的“入门套件”，而是自己构建了一个： https://www.saasrocket.pro 它叫做SaaSRocket。它并不革命性——只是实际上是完整的： - Supabase（身份验证 + 数据库） - Resend（事务性邮件） - Lemon Squeezy（Stripe替代支付） - Cloudinary（博客/媒体上传） - 带有SEO和单元测试的仪表板布局我将它定价为49美元，因为模板不应该让人感觉像是在买车。它是为独立创始人和独立开发者设计的，特别是在低收入地区。我很好奇——为什么大多数开发者只是忍受这些高价模板？你理想中的模板是什么样的？它的价格应该是多少？你总是手动添加的一个功能是什么？欢迎提出尖锐的反馈——我正在用这个来构建我下一个SaaS。 —— Shreyan X: @ShreyanRants

查看原文

Hey HN,I've been building indie SaaS products for a while now, and one thing kept bugging me:Why are SaaS boilerplates so damn expensive — and still so incomplete?$199 for boilerplates that don’t even include payments?Some don’t have auth wired in properly.Others are bloated with stuff I end up ripping out.So instead of buying another overpriced "starter kit," I built my own: https://www.saasrocket.proIt's called SaaSRocket. It’s not revolutionary — it's just actually complete:Supabase (auth + DB)Resend (transactional emails)Lemon Squeezy (Stripe alt payments)Cloudinary (blogs/media uploads)Dashboard layout with SEO + unit testsI priced it at $49, because boilerplates shouldn’t feel like buying a car. It’s meant for solo founders and indie hackers, especially in lower-income regions.I’m curious — is there a reason most devs just tolerate overpriced boilerplates?What would your ideal boilerplate look like? What would it cost? What’s the one feature you always end up adding manually?Open to brutal feedback — I’m using this to build my next SaaS myself.– Shreyan X: @ShreyanRants

为什么SaaS模板仍然这么贵？所以我自己动手做了一个。